On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:00:32PM -0500, Doug Chapman wrote:
> Actually I came up with what I think is a cleaner fix for this. Since
> the default file permission on files on vfat are 755 anyway if the
> kernel is mode 755 rpm doesn't complain.
>
> Anybody have thoughts on this specfile change? I build this as a
> scratch build on our ia64 koji server and it installs cleanly.
>
> - Doug
>
> *** kernel.spec.bad 2008-02-28 19:58:55.000000000 -0500
> --- kernel.spec 2008-02-28 21:39:57.000000000 -0500
> *************** BuildKernel() {
> *** 1301,1306 ****
> --- 1301,1310 ----
> $CopyKernel $KernelImage \
> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{image_install_path}/$InstallName-$KernelVer
>
> + %ifarch ia64
> + chmod 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{image_install_path}/$InstallName-$KernelVer
> + %endif
> +
> mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/modules/$KernelVer
> make -s ARCH=$Arch INSTALL_MOD_PATH=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT modules_install KERNELRELEASE=$KernelVer
> %ifarch %{vdso_arches}
There are systems with EFI32 and EFI64 out there, that aren't ia64,
but that will likewise be dropping files into a vfat file system.
--
Matt Domsch
Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
