On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 11:48:20AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > > > For Fedora 9 maybe it should be the sysfs interface if it works. > > i don't really see a harm in having both. > > I imagine that eventually someone upstream will make the decision a no-brainer > by removing the proc stuff. Not shipping it does mean that nothing new will > start depending on it. (Unlikely I know, but still...) > This is true. The patch I submitted to hal (I think it's in git, but not sure it has made it into a release or Fedora) preferentially selects sysfs over procfs, so hopefully that will at least encourage people to fix the shortcomings, if any, in the sysfs interfaces. :/ cheers, Kyle _______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
