On Wednesday 30 January 2008 11:05:44 am Jarod Wilson wrote: > Roland, I don't suppose any of the recent changes I seem to recall hearing > you were going to make to debuginfo might have anything to do with this... Further prodding reveals its not a case of us winding up with extra files in the package or anything like that, its simply that none of the bits are stripped. Still poking at things trying to understand why... # file libata.ko libata.ko: ELF 32-bit LSB relocatable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), not stripped > ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- > > Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20080130 changes > Date: Wednesday 30 January 2008 > From: Jarod Wilson <jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > On Wednesday 30 January 2008 10:57:18 am Jarod Wilson wrote: > > On Wednesday 30 January 2008 10:47:16 am Ralf Ertzinger wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > > > On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:48:21 -0500, Build System wrote: > > > > kernel-2.6.24-9.fc9 > > > > ------------------- > > > > * Tue Jan 29 2008 John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > - A few more wireless fixes for 2.6.25 > > > > - Some post-2.6.25 wireless updates > > > > - Actually, we support the new b43 firmware... > > > > > > the -PAE package for this is 202MB in size, which can't be right. > > > > Ew, something is whacked out... kernel.i686, kernel-PAE.i686 and > > kernel.ppc are all in the 200MB range. kernel.x86_64 and kernel.ppc64 > > look fine though. Investibigating... > > Something is horked with debug stripping. All the massive kernels have > unnaturally small -debuginfo packages. We'll get that fixed... -- Jarod Wilson jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
