On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Jarod Wilson wrote: > On Saturday 26 January 2008 05:19:14 am Roland McGrath wrote: > > Is F-[78] going to stay on 2.6.23 for a while, or switch to 2.6.24 fairly > > soon? > > Chuck was talking about branching in cvs to start doing 2.6.24 builds for at > least F8 as soon as possible for people to test w/o committing to an > immediate upgrade from 2.6.23, but I'd assume if testing goes well with > 2.6.24, we'll move to it fairly soon. 2.6.24 (and recent 2.6.23 kernels) need the following patch to avoid spurious SELinux denials for files in /proc. It's been sent to Linus & stable folk, but may take a few days to be merged due to LCA. I suggest applying this to rawhide asap. commit b1aa5301b9f88a4891061650c591fb8fe1c1d1da Author: Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri Jan 25 13:03:42 2008 -0500 selinux: fix labeling of /proc/net inodes The proc net rewrite had a side effect on selinux, leading it to mislabel the /proc/net inodes, thereby leading to incorrect denials. Fix security_genfs_sid to ignore extra leading / characters in the path supplied by selinux_proc_get_sid since we now get "//net/..." rather than "/net/...". Signed-off-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/services.c b/security/selinux/ss/services.c index f83b19d..4bf715d 100644 --- a/security/selinux/ss/services.c +++ b/security/selinux/ss/services.c @@ -1744,6 +1744,9 @@ int security_genfs_sid(const char *fstype, struct ocontext *c; int rc = 0, cmp = 0; + while (path[0] == '/' && path[1] == '/') + path++; + POLICY_RDLOCK; for (genfs = policydb.genfs; genfs; genfs = genfs->next) { _______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list