Christopher Brown wrote: > On 21/01/2008, Adam Jackson <ajackson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> http://people.freedesktop.org/~ajax/kernel-autopatch.patch >> >> Based on something I did for the xserver specfile. Essentially this >> makes it so you only have to name the patches once, in the order you >> want to apply them, which makes it both easier to work with and harder >> to forget things. >> >> I've tried to make this as friendly and robust as possible, including >> bailing out appropriately when faced with a bad patch, and explicitly >> naming patches that fail to apply right at the end of build output. >> Feedback would be appreciated, even if it's of the form "no, that's >> gross." > > Can't speak from an implementation point of view but you must be a > mind-reader. Several people will appreciate the thought behind it, > myself included. On #fedora-kernel recently: > > <kylem> i really find it irritating that i need to edit Patchxx: *and* > add an ApplyPatch. > * kylem ponders converting the spec file to use quilt. > <j-rod> fark > <j-rod> not a fan of that either > <jwb> why not j-rod ? > <f13> I think he meant he's not a fan of editing twice. > <f13> not that he wasn't a fan of quilt. > <jwb> oh > <kylem> i always forget to do one or the other :\ First glance says oh hell yeah, check it in. -- Jarod Wilson jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
