Re: Getting rid of sysprof-kmod

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 01:02:23AM +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
 > Hi,
 > I just finished removing the sysprof-kmod package from CVS as mandated
 > by the new guidelines for F9 and above.
 > 
 > I am now seeking some help to understand what is needed to have again
 > the kernel module required for proper operations of the sysprof
 > package.
 > 
 > Upstream sources are at:
 > http://www.daimi.au.dk/~sandmann/sysprof/

The upstream kernel is likely to eventually get support for
perfmon2 integrated, but this could really use more work.
It's been in -mm for a while.  If there's anything that sysprof
can do that perfmon can't (which would be surprising given
perfmons featuritis) it would useful to talk with the perfmon
developers so we can eventually arrive at an upstreamed solution
and not have to worry about integrating out-of-tree patches.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux