On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 04:23:57PM +0100, Christopher Brown wrote: > On 21/09/2007, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I've created a #fedora-kernel channel on freenode in response > > to the large number of /msg's I continue to get which really > > should be going to a wider audience. > > > > I expect it to be low-traffic, but it may be a worthwhile experiment > > to see if it helps any for triage, coordination etc. > > Is there any value is punting out a message to fedora-test to get more > people on the case with triaging? Yeah, can't hurt. > I'm getting to the point now where bugs > aren't so old any more therefore people remember why they filed, can still > replicate the bug so the process rate is slowing somewhat. When you say /msg > do you mean people in IRC or bugzilla emails about bug status changes. People. > Is it worth setting up a bugzilla monitor to show status changes to kernel bugs? There's always #fedorabot (though that shows bug changes to all packages). Perhaps we could get whoever controls it to join #fedora-kernel too if it can be trained to only talk about kernel bugs, though I'm not sure if it'll be annoying or not. Opinions? > Also, is it worth setting mailman to change the reply-to address so it goes > to the list rather than the poster a-la -devel and -test? I try to stay out of that argument as much as possible, as it seems have vocal proponents/opponents on both sides, and tbh, I don't think there's a way that'll please everyone. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk _______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
