Re: CONFIG_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW hurts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gilboa Davara wrote:

>> So,
>> what's the point of the IRQ stack-depth check, again?  Especially with
>> 4k stacks and separate IRQ stacks?  And the more deterministic
>> max-stack-depth excursion checker (CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE) as well...

>> Finally, the patch I sent upstream would clearly show on an oops whether
>> or not the stack was currently overflowing, or whether the stack had
>> ever overflowed prior to the oops.  Seemed useful to me.
> 
> Just to satisfy my curiosity, can you post a link to the patch?

Sure: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/31/28


-Eric

_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux