Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 08/22/2007 11:18 AM, Steve Dickson wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 10:29:53AM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> If people try mounting several exports from the same filesystem, it
fails
> with confusing error messages if the mount options are different
for some
> of the mount points. Adding "nosharecache" to the mount options
fixes that,
> but people with working setups suddenly find they need this new
option to
> use a setup that used to work without it. Should we just revert
that patch?
Just curious... What are the differences in the mounts options that
is causing this new check to pop, which in turn is failing the mount?
In at least one case it is read-only vs. read-write.
This should not make the check pop...
User mounts something from the server read-only, then mounts selected
exports from the same filesystem read-write on top of that.
The check looks for difference protocols, I/O sizes, or cache timeouts
so there has to be something other ro/rw that is causing the
mounts to fail...
steved.
_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
