Re: modsign vs build-id

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Roland McGrath wrote:
> >> That was from revision 1.87.
> > 
> > Hmm.  Actually the failure mode from before was not "modprobe" problems,
> > but never getting that far because the insmods in the initrd failed.
> > Do you have some magical setup that needs no modules?  Or did it really
> > succeed at boot-time insmods and then modprobe fails?
> 
> Looks like it really succeeded at boot-time insmods, I've got dm_*,
> ata_piix, ata_generic, libata, sd_mod, scsi_mod, ext3, jbd, mbcache and
> {e,o,u}hci_hcd modules all loaded.

Ok, color me ungentlemanly, but I have to ask if you've got the right
things installed on disk where modprobe is looking.  I mean, where did you
get those modules with good signatures for the initrd if the ones on disk
are bad?

This is encouraging me to add the hack I had in mind the other day to make
the kernel tell you the public key it's using in a /sys file.



Thanks,
Roland

_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux