Re: modsign vs build-id

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> Roland McGrath wrote:
>>> This has nothing to do with the modsign issue.
>> Hrm... It didn't start happening (that I noticed) until after some of
>> the recent changes you'd made, so I thought you might have an inkling =
as
>> to what was going on.
>=20
> I do, but it's harmless and not related to the modsign issue.

My main point was to make sure it was going to get fixed, and if you
already know what's up, I presume you'll fix it and I don't need to
spend time looking into it. :)

>> However, the behavior of the resulting kernel build *does* appear to b=
e
>> related. I can't load any modules:
>>
>> # modprobe e1000
>> FATAL: Error inserting e1000 (/lib/modules/.../e1000.ko): Key was
>> rejected by service.
>=20
> The is the failure mode that revision 1.84 of kernel.spec fixed.
> Are you using the current spec?

That was from revision 1.87.

>> Best guess is that something goes haywire since I did this build
>> '--without debuginfo'.
>=20
> I can't see how that would break the fix for module signing.

Was just a guess and perhaps not even an educated one. I'll poke at it a
bit more.

--=20
Jarod Wilson
jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux