Re: kqemu inclusion in kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Dave Jones wrote:

A much better way to get this stuff into Fedora is to find out why
it isn't getting upstream, and get involved with whatever cleanup
work is necessary to get it there.

Upstream (of which a lot of people are working at RedHat as well, so
telling them to go upstream is kinda moot) often don't even start to
listen. There is no politics in the kernel, because kernel people are
just not enganging in an discussion at all.

Who even submitted these patches upstream to start engaging in a discussion?

in case of kqemu nobody... seems qemu upstream isn't really interessted in doing this.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux