On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 02:15:15PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
<snip>
>
> Do -debuginfo packages for variants get produced automatically?
>
> I'm assuming yes based on this part of the macro..
>
> > +%if %{with_debuginfo}\
> > +%ifnarch noarch\
> > +%{expand:%%files %{?2:%{2}-}debuginfo}\
> > +%defattr(-,root,root)\
> > +%if "%{elf_image_install_path}" != ""\
> > +%{debuginfodir}/%{elf_image_install_path}/*-%{KVERREL}%{?2}.debug\
> > +%endif\
> > +%{debuginfodir}/lib/modules/%{KVERREL}%{?2}\
> > +%{debuginfodir}/usr/src/kernels/%{KVERREL}%{?2:-%{2}}-%{_target_cpu}\
> > +%{?-a:%{debuginfodir}%{-a*}.debug}\
> > +%endif\
> > +%endif\
> > +%endif\
>
> but for some reason, it doesn't sit right in my head.
>
> I've no real fundamental objection to this, but don't leave the country
> or have any accidents for a while after it goes in :-)
> Just as when Jarod did the versioning overhaul, if something goes awry,
> you'd probably be able to figure out the problem quicker than those
> getting up to speed on what you've done so far.
Having been through the (painful) process of transforming the 2.6.20
FC-6 kernel spec into a kernel-xen spec recently, I liked the change
to have less duplicated information through the spec file.
The macro expansion syntax of RPM is ugly, but I would prefer that than
having a big spec file with lots of duplicated info.
If Roland hide, leave the country, or something like this, I offer myself
to help on this if something goes wrong. :)
--
Eduardo
Attachment:
pgpsCRHC8tGn1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
