On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 12:28 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Jon Masters (jcm@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 22:13 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > > > Frankly, I think this sort of computation should either a) be done in modutils, so > > > that it's upstream for any kernel b) just be done in the places that need this info > > > (anaconda, livecd-tools). They can even just share the implementation. > > > > It can be done in module-init-tools, and probably should be. Let me take > > a look. > > Actually, the more I think about it... is this really appropriate for all > upstream m-i-t users? Especially since it will probably be a never-ending > task of adjusting the symbol list to find the proper modules. When davej and I talked about it, we decided "probably not". And maintaining two lists of it is insane, so we decided putting the info in the kernel package wasn't a bad thing. Especially as that's where you'll know when you need to change it Jeremy _______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
