On 2024-07-29 01.09, Javier Perez wrote:
And this is why I had to upgrade my perfectly working 10 year old system
to something new.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 6:33 AM Marc Deop i Argemí
<marcdeop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:marcdeop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
On Friday 19 July 2024 13:30:04 CEST Sérgio Basto wrote:
> your decision was not support it , your decision was remove it
and not
> let anyone support it, you try force the X11 removal , which is
> complete different .
I will kindly ask you for a second time in this thread to stop
bringing this
up.
Thank you
--
Marc Deop i Argemí
System Engineer
It is important. From a user point of view, if the OS as supplied isn't
working as we have used in the past due to some forced mandate, then
there is a disservice to the users. In this case, forcing Wayland onto
users when it isn't ready, then it is even worse.
I will be staying with F39 until I see that Wayland is working as good
if not better than X11 with KDE. As I see on discuss.kde.org, it is
much worse as posted this week.
"In conclusion, you gain nothing with Wayland as a user experience, but
you lose a lot. It is no faster, no more capable, and no easier to use
than X (arguably less so), and you lose all control over your GPU and
displays."
Robin
--
_______________________________________________
kde mailing list -- kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to kde-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
