Re: Fedora Linux 35 Final blocker review summary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2021-10-16 at 08:26 +0000, Mattia Verga wrote:
> On 15/10/21 20:22, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2021-10-15 at 14:04 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > Many fewer blockers than last week. Hooray! Go/No-Go for target date
> > > #1 is Thursday.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Action summary
> > > ====================
> > > 
> > > Accepted blockers
> > > -----------------
> > > 
> > > 3. plasma-discover — Discover shows a misleading state of Flatpak
> > > repos, can't delete disabled repos — NEW
> > > ACTION: Maintainers to fix issue
> > > 
> > > 4. plasma-discover — Discover doesn't seem to find any RPM packages,
> > > neither locally installed nor in RPM repos — NEW
> > > ACTION: Maintainers to fix issue
> > > 
> > > 5. plasma-discover — Toggling repo in Discover doesn't redraw the
> > > checkbox, confusing users — NEW
> > > ACTION: Maintainers to fix issue
> > So I'm pretty worried about these. I've spent the last two days trying
> > to fix 3 and 5 myself, but I'm just not a Qt C++ developer so it's
> > pretty tough sledding. I basically understand the problems in both
> > cases, but fixing them is more work. I have put detailed notes in the
> > upstream bug reports, and I'm happy to compare notes with anyone who
> > wants to try and help:
> > 
> > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443455
> > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406295
> > 
> > #4 is odd as it seems to behave differently for different people at
> > different times; we haven't figured out the condition that causes the
> > 'bad' state yet.
> > 
> > Nobody else appears to be trying to help. I'm not confident we are
> > going to have these fixed in time.
> > --
> > Adam Williamson
> 
> IMO, those bugs should have never been approved as Release Blockers.
> They are bugs that are already present in previous releases (F34 for
> sure) and, while it would be nice to have them fixed sooner or later,
> they should not block F35.

That's a discussion we can have, but someone needs to start it and
provide some reasoning. Rex said he was going to comment on the
blockers last week, but he didn't.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net

_______________________________________________
kde mailing list -- kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to kde-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux