Ahoy KDE folks! I noticed today that the KDE critical path definition is almost empty: https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/blob/main/f/comps-f35.xml.in#_741 compare to the GNOME one: https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/blob/main/f/comps-f35.xml.in#_707 this means that most KDE updates aren't tagged as critical path, even if they could completely break the desktop. I think it'd be appropriate to have packages that could plausibly result in the desktop being entirely broken added to that category, but I don't know enough about KDE to know which are reasonable candidates. Could someone take a look at this? Thanks! Updates being critical path requires them to meet slightly higher minimum thresholds to be pushed stable, and it would also cause openQA to run its update tests on them, which would be useful validation I think. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ kde mailing list -- kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to kde-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
