Re: EPEL RHEL8 - Missing documentation for several Qt classes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 5:54 PM Syam Krishnan <syamcr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying to build a customized workstation ISO for RHEL8 with
> KDE and Qt development packages. I'm almost done, but just today I
> noticed a serious problem - the Qt documentation is missing lots of Qt
> classes. I have installed all "qt5*doc" packages. I have found that the
> compressed help files (qch) from some of these are much smaller than the
> files from Fedora 32 package.
>
> I have filed a bug report on Fedora EPEL against qt5-doc.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905755
>
> Does anyone have any idea why this is so?
>
> Also, I have noticed that all qt5 packages from RHEL are v5.12.5 while
> many from EPEL are v5.12.8. The doc packages, however are v5.12.3.
>

Looking
It looks like Jan is already looking at it, but I'll look at it from
the EPEL side.

Troy
_______________________________________________
kde mailing list -- kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to kde-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux