On 01/04/2019 20:03, Adam Williamson wrote:
So, here's the specific text I propose. At Basic we would change this requirement: "The boot menu for all supported installer and live images should include an entry which causes both installation and the installed system to use a generic, highly compatible video driver (such as 'vesa'). This mechanism should work correctly, launching the installer or desktop and attempting to use the generic driver." To read only: "The boot menu for all release-blocking installer and live images should include an entry which causes both installation and the installed system to use a generic, highly compatible video driver (such as 'vesa')." i.e. remove the second sentence (and change 'supported' to 'release- blocking' - that is a better form of words that should have been used all along).
I'm not familiar with the in-crowd dialect here, but it seems strange that 'release-blocking' is thought to be much the same as 'supported'. Isn't the first bad and the second good ?
Perhaps it means 'images distributed before and after formal release' ? John P _______________________________________________ kde mailing list -- kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to kde-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
