On Saturday, 14 July 2018 20:39:47 CET Joe Buckley wrote: > Since I saw the discussion about dropping Amarok (because of the use of > qt4???) FYI amarok from master does not depend on qt4, they "released" version 2.9.70 not too long ago: https://github.com/KDE/amarok/commit/217b33c7eadf63643426f08ae805d61c99a6ee67 I just built myself a package and the difference in speed/smoothness is substantial :-) ldd /usr/bin/amarok | grep Qt5Core libQt5Core.so.5 => /lib64/libQt5Core.so.5 (0x00007fc350ccc000) I must admit though that there are a couple of rough edges here and there. I might create a COPR if I get to clean up my horrible mess of modified spec file. -- Marc Deop i Argemí System Engineer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ kde mailing list -- kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to kde-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
