On 10/05/16 07:15, Ed Greshko wrote: > > On 10/05/16 07:00, Gerald B. Cox wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Ed Greshko <ed.greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx >> <mailto:ed.greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> >> So, offline updates on KDE are unnecessary to workaround the issue for the time being. >> >> >> Ed, yes I understand that... but... >> That isn't my question. My question relates to the apparent "official" Fedora >> recommendation >> to NOT use dnf within a terminal under a DE - but instead to only use the GNOME GUI which >> does all updates with a reboot required each time. >> >> > I read Adam's posts to say the way for KDE folks to do it would be under a VT. > > I run systems with no, or very little GNOME bits. I don't even know how > easy/hard/recommended it would be to use GNOME's update method under my situation. And, I > must say, I wouldn't have any curiosity to find out. :-) > > Oh, I should say that for the time being I'm ssh'ing into my systems from my tablet and updating using dnf that way. I rather prefer the logs kept by dnf and have run into "confusion" when I mixed in using KDE's "Software Update" and couldn't track down when I updated a particular package. -- You're Welcome Zachary Quinto _______________________________________________ kde mailing list -- kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to kde-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
