On 11/08/15 07:41, Rex Dieter wrote: > Ed Greshko wrote: > >> >> On 11/08/15 07:33, Rex Dieter wrote: >>> Ed Greshko wrote: >>> >>>> Of course... As I said, the "enabled" repos.... >>> OK, lastly, does yum or dnf see this updates too or not? >>> >>> Either way, something wierd is going on. >>> >> I did edit dnf.conf .... (which I sort of mentioned in my original >> message) > Please remove the exclude from dnf.conf and retest (it should not be needed > if in .repo files). I'm curious if it dnf behavior is the same as pk or not > wrt to exclude= in .repo files only. > [root@localhost dnf]# cat dnf.conf [main] gpgcheck=1 installonly_limit=3 clean_requirements_on_remove=true [root@localhost dnf]# root@localhost dnf]# dnf clean all Cleaning repos: updates fedora Cleaning up Everything [root@localhost dnf]# dnf --refresh check-update Fedora 23 - x86_64 - Updates 1.7 MB/s | 4.9 MB 00:02 Fedora 23 - x86_64 2.0 MB/s | 43 MB 00:21 Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:34 ago on Sun Nov 8 07:45:02 2015. [root@localhost dnf]# -- In reality, some people should stick to running Windows and others should stay away from computers altogether. _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
