On Wednesday 19 August 2015 12:20:34 Emmett Culley wrote: > These servers are all development servers, and having NFS access allows our > development IDE's to have direct access to the code under development. So > there is a very good use case for having "unstable" NFS servers on the > network. I don't see a functional difference between that above and a single server holding the code in shares (one share per dev server, for example), and both dev server and IDE system mounting a share. You would have to change nfs share to work with different code/branch, but now you changing IP of the NFS server anyway, so it is very similar. I do agree that this does not change the fact that there seem to be bigger issue. However changing the way you using NFS may give you working system now, instead of waiting for upstream to see this as an issue, which is not certain, and the fix it. Piotr _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org