Re: Proposal: Defer browser decision until QtWebEngine's fate is clear

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 12 of August 2015 14:16:23 Martin Bříza wrote:
> -1 from me, for now.
> Once there's a decision on a topic, we won't cast a new vote a day after
> the previous one was closed. We can wait how the situation will have
> developed until F24 and then switch to whatever is most suitable.
> 
> In my opinion, we should ship a system that's usable, even for the cost of
> not being 100% "pure". If there's a usable Qt based browser half a year
>  from now, why not switch again. It's not like we force the user to not use
> whatever else he wants to.

-1 from me too, I totally agree with Martin.

Jan
-- 
Jan Grulich <jgrulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Software Engineer, Desktop team
Red Hat Czech
_______________________________________________
kde mailing list
kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org




[Index of Archives]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux