On Aug 7, 2015 9:43 AM, "Kevin Kofler" <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Mustafa Muhammad wrote:
> > Some of my points were:
> >
> > 1) Almost dead upstream for Konq, vs thriving upstream for Firefox, Konq
> > may have undiscovered security vulnerabilities, but the limited number of
> > users is hiding them.
>
> The limited number of users also means nobody will be targeting Konqueror
> with attacks. IMHO, this is actually an advantage.
"Security through irrelevancy" isn't exactly a convincing argument..
>
> A non-KDE browser will NEVER be an option for a KDE spin no matter how often
> you ask for it.
>
> Kevin Kofler
Isn't that for the vote to decide, Kevin? Hence, you know, the vote? We wouldn't be the first distro to decide that a "pure" KDE experience isn't in the best interests of the users. _______________________________________________
> kde mailing list
> kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
> New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
_______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
