I don't know about CVE's specifically, but Konqueror's development (https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/applications/kde-baseapps/repository/revisions/master/show/konqueror) last src/ update was 4 months ago for one specific file-- every other file hasn't been touched in a year or more. From a security standpoint.. I'm retracting my thoughts around "Firefox or Rekonq" and instead opting for "Firefox or Chromium", and im not even sure if Chromium ever made it into Fedora's repos. Plus, were Rekonq or Konqueror ever ported to Frameworks? If not then neither of them are Wayland-native
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Markus Slopianka <kamikazow@xxxxxx> wrote:
On Sunday 26 July 2015 23:48:07 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Rekonq is a more acceptable option
Rekonq is dead:
http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=rekonq.git&a=log
Last real development was done 18 months ago.
I'm afraid to even look up how many open CVEs QtWebKit and KHTML have. Neither
are actively developed any longer.
Does a single contributor's attitude towards Mozilla really rank higher than
security?
_______________________________________________
kde mailing list
kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
_______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
