Re: F22 blocker/freeze exception review: on-list? in-bug? special meeting?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 19:53 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 05/12/2015 05:53 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 16:45 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>>> If, and I say if since I've not tested, this fixes the session
> >>>> restore issues of Plasma 5 then to me it is a *must* for F22
> >>>> release.
> >>>
> >>> Ditto.
> >>
> >> Session restore doesn't seem like a great FE candidate, since people
> >> don't usually use sessions on live images.
> >
> > Anyone who uses the live image to test the new release, and after
> > installing it discovers that sessions don't restore, is going to be
> > pretty unhappy. Stock up on flame-proof jackets.
> >
> > poc
> 
> After installing they can just update to get a fix.

I guess what I'm really asking is why this bug, which was reported over
three months ago and is very obvious to anyone who tries to use
session-restore, is still present in a release candidate.

poc

_______________________________________________
kde mailing list
kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org





[Index of Archives]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux