On 03/14/2015 05:30 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
Seems you're a bit out of the loop then. You're trying to spin a decision that they have accepted was a mistake and are working to correct.
I'm not trying to "spin" anything, and I'd prefer if you could stop the constant antagonizing. I understand you're frustrated and why you're frustrated, but that doesn't justify bad behavior. The decision you're referring to was to drop KLocale in favor of improving QLocale, for the reasons I outlined. The "working to correct" part refers to improving QLocale even further, i.e. continuing the process of adding KLocale features to Qt. Describing this as "correcting a mistake" is _actual_ spin, since you're painting eggs on faces where none exists -- notice nothing in John's comments you linked actually supports that narrative. You're certainly free to disagree with the original decision and refer to it as a mistake if you feel qualified to make that call, however. As for timeframe, Qt 5.5 is currently in feature freeze and will likely be released in April. It contains no rele- vant new features in QLocale. The next opportunity to introduce new feature in QLocale is therefore the Qt 5.6 release cycle, which will deliver about half a year later. A Plasma Desktop release depending on Qt 5.6 will likely be released in early 2016. However, there is currently no confirmation of expanded QLocale functionality in Qt 5.6. Cheers, Eike _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
