Re: Why such an unusual name?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 26 of September 2014 16:15 José Matos wrote:
> On Friday 26 September 2014 15:50:11 Reindl Harald wrote:
> > why not?
> > 
> > that informations are so much more clear than just the
> > version number if someone wants to browse GIT and
> > review changes
> 
> One reason could be the fact that the packager chose to package a
> development version instead of a released version, for example if the git
> revision has the patches that (s)he considered appropriate to include.
> 
> I have not look into this specific case so my considerations are generic.
> :-)
> 
> Regards,

Hi,

exactly!! I decided to package a git snapshot, because there are important 
fixes for 0.9.3.4 version. You don't have to be worry about stability, because 
I know, as an upstream developer of plasma-nm, what is safe and important to 
include in Fedora or not. 

Regards,
Jan
-- 
Jan Grulich 
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o
jgrulich@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
kde mailing list
kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org





[Index of Archives]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux