On 07/15/2014 05:39 PM, Daniel Vrátil wrote:
Hi, speaking with my KDE PIM developer hat on, I think it makes a lot of sense to actually split the package per-app, so we would have kdepim-akonadiconsole (I'd actually prefer if this was not installed by default, so that people would not be tempted to play with it :P) kdepim-akregator kdepim-blogilo kdepim-kaddressbook kdepim-kjots kdepim-kleopatra kdepim-kmail kdepim-knode kdepim-knotes kdepim-kontact kdepim-korganizer kdepim-libs (libs shared by multiple PIM apps) kdepim-common (?) (shared executables, like incidenceeditor-ng, Akonadi agents, etc)
One suggestion (apologies in advance if I've not understood it correctly). Why "kdepim-*" naming for applications? It might make sense for libraries, but not applications. I think its better to just have kontact, korganizer etc. rather than with "kdepim-" prefix.
I think we had something like this for kate, okteta etc. which was sometimes irritating since one had to yum search for "*kate*" to figure out the package name for installation. Anyway, nowadays, its just kate and okteta, and I'm liking it.
Syam _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
