Re: kde-4.13.x for f20, include optional nepomuk support or not?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rex Dieter wrote:

> On 06/22/2014 07:20 PM, Markus Slopianka wrote:
>> Hi.
>> Not sure why it seems to happen with every update but once again
>> kde-workspace 4.11.10 tries to install Nepomuk. ;-)
>>
>> Is there anything we can do to help fix this?
> 
> it's just that the nepomuk-free kde-workspace build from kde-unstable
> got superceded by a recent update:
> 
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-7457/kde-workspace-4.11.10-2.fc20
> 
> We have concrete plans to start work on brining kde-4.13.x to f20
> officially, but I guess we haven't decided on how best to deal with the
> nepomuk transition yet (ie, whether remove nepomuk-related deps from
> core kde packages or not).


OK, kde-sig members, please add your opinion this topic ^^.

I think I'm of a mind to removing optional nepomuk-related deps when 
kde-4.13.x lands, since
* baloo migrates old nepomuk data
* nepomukserver no longer runs, so the related features don't really work 
anymore (afaik).

-- Rex

_______________________________________________
kde mailing list
kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org





[Index of Archives]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux