Am 29.03.2014 23:34, schrieb g: > On 03/29/14 15:45, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Rex Dieter wrote: >> >>> g wrote: >>> >>>> yet, in reality, my point, which one missed, is that when it >>>> comes to web browsers and email clients, it is like >>>> baskin-robbins, there are many choices to make and that choice >>>> should be left to user. not packages that are loaded by default >>>> when a new installation is made. >>> >>> Thanks, but I think it's a given that we need to install one web >>> browser by default, and that the question is which one. Not >>> installing any (or some how providing a choice) is not an option >>> we are considering. > > is linux not all about _choice_. ;-) you have the choice all the time to install whatever browser you want or even any available at the same time >> On the other hand, we *could* move the webbrowser outside of >> treating it as part of the desktop environment, and more as an >> (essential) addon application. > > that could be a better way. and, "even mo betta" if it where set up > to give user/installer a _choice_ as to which browser and i want to have some additional choices in the installer: * what texteditor * what video player * what audio player * what image viewer no, i don't want that really i only want to point out where that leads why should a browser be handeled special and whatever justification you would use what do you do if the same is taken for any sort of software and who will maintain that?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
