On Thursday 27 March 2014 14:49:24 Kevin Kofler wrote: > IMHO, QtWebEngine is a step backwards all over the place (compared to > QtWebKit). :-( Nested bundling (bundled Chromium which bundles the world), > much more limited platform (CPU) support, less powerful API (because > Chromium doesn't expose as much as WebKit did, which limits what QtWebEngine > can offer), no GStreamer support, no QNetworkAccessManager/KIO support, … If anybody is able to continue to maintain QtWebKit (eg. by coordinating with the WebKit-GTK people to use the same branch), I'd welcome them with open arms. _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
