On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 09:29 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > Yep, and that probably leads back to the question if we want or don't want to > > provide more products than we currently have so far (three). And to be honest, > > I like idea having more products but with very high bar (that should apply > > for all products) - to avoid a situation of having dozens of products but > > still be inclusive. > > All of your subsequent email is perfectly fine, but this thread is > focused on what we want to do with KDE in the Workstation product. If > you want to advocate for a KDE product, please take that discussion to > the devel list. I don't want to derail this conversation, and this > list isn't the right place to discuss what you're suggesting. Well. This thread was sparked partly by my FESCo ticket, which is written from a project-wide perspective, not a product/WG-specific one. The project as a whole has skin in this game: it is important to the project how the project chooses to deliver KDE, and if the answer is 'in more than one way', the relative importance of those ways. The Workstation WG is free to integrate KDE into their product in any appropriate way, of course, but I think the project *as a whole* has a say in whether that's our primary method of distributing KDE - how heavily it's promoted, how hard it's tested, and whether it blocks our releases. In that context, the existence or otherwise and relative importance of a KDE spin is obviously significant. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
