On 02/28/2012 12:37 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
But you can still try to write patch and push it through the review
process as the project it now open.
R.
Well, but who will be the one reviewing it? Thiago, I guess. The problem
is not that there is no solution, the problem is that the solution was
intentionally removed (qt3 works) with explanation "you had enough time
(during qt3 life cycle) to fix your files". Proposing it for inclusion
again in this situation, will be a waste of time imo.
----- Original Message -----
Michal Hlavinka wrote:
Regarding Qt 5 - is it still early enough for bigger changes?
Qt 5 is already in feature freeze.
In Qt 4 there is ugly bug:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165044
This bug was closed wontfix (and because of heated discussion, bug
assignee removed himself from cc list), after some time they
changed
resolution to "upstream" which just means "wontfixed in upstream".
There is also
http://www.macieira.org/blog/2011/09/qurl-in-qt-5-encoding/
where this is going to be fixed in QUrl (if I read it correctly),
but
Thiago said the same again - file names with broken (non-utf-8)
encoding
are filesystem corruption and applications creating such files
should be
fixed.
Even if it weren't, I doubt Qt upstream would change their mind
there,
sorry.
It's nothing we can do anything about in Fedora in any case.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
kde mailing list
kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
_______________________________________________
kde mailing list
kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
_______________________________________________
kde mailing list
kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
