On 10/09/11 03:25 AM, José Matos wrote: > On 09/10/2011 01:43 AM, Dariusz J. Garbowski wrote: >> Thanks for detailed answer. I was hoping this might just be the case of building the package but the >> case being as it is I see why it's a pain to do staying compliant with Fedora policies. >> >> Regards, >> Dariusz > > I can understand your frustration but IMHO the sentence above is unfair. > > If any package was allowed to bundle any library can you imagine what > would be the maintenance burden? > > Since the developers time is limited there are trade-offs to be done and > the priority was to stabilise the changes in kde-4.7 since the packages > framework behind has changed. Hi Jose, Maybe I wasn't clear enough -- what I was trying to say in my post is that I completely understand the reasons and accept them. :-) Cheers, Dariusz _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
