Ok I can see a lot of input here - could you put it to this wiki page? [1] Then we can track it and decide based on your input. Thanks Jaroslav [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/F15Features/KDEPIM46QA On Thursday, January 20, 2011 09:43:13 am moabi2000 wrote: > Does Kmail2 still more than double the diskspace used if you have > local maildirs? (see https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=249987) > > I run on a small SSD and space is at a premium. When I tested kmail 2 > it took my 15Gb of mail and with the akonadi cache and the nepomuk > index ended up using more than 32Gb. That's 25% of my drive space, > which I can't justify. Its great that kmail2 doesn't touch existing > mail to avoid risks of corruption etc, but I can't test kmail2 until > there is an option to not cache ALL the mail store. I presume there > are other users in this category. > > At the moment I am back to using Gnus - migration was a pain due to > kmail's non-standard maildirs, but now working great. > > Cheers > M. > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Michal Hlavinka <mhlavink@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 13:08:15 Rex Dieter wrote: > >> Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > >> > keep kdepim-4.6 or revert to kdepim-4.4 > >> > > >> > * user reports > >> > ** rdieter report success using kmail 4.6 with his 100 mb GMail > >> > mailbox ** dgilmore testing against ~100gb imap mail: (mostly) fail, > >> > initial sync of data resulted in akonadi crash, and pegging cpu for > >> > quite awhile ** jreznik reports - importing new email ok, actually > >> > very good, after restart Akonadi and Nepomuk eating 100% cpu > >> > ** than reports several crashes > >> > ** we need more users testing! > >> > >> To be clear, we're mostly interested in testing/feedback of the lastest > >> builds, kdepim-4.5.94.1 (or newer). > >> > >> (We are already aware of much badness with previous 4.6 pre-release > >> builds). > > > > I'm always using the latest with hope that it will become much better. I > > agree there was much more badness in previous 4.6 pre-release builds, > > but from my pov the progress made is still not sufficient. > > _______________________________________________ > > kde mailing list > > kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde > > New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org > > _______________________________________________ > kde mailing list > kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde > New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org -- Jaroslav ÅeznÃk <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno Office: +420 532 294 275 Mobile: +420 602 797 774 Red Hat, Inc. http://cz.redhat.com/ _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
