Re: Modular KDE?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 3:59 AM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In addition to what Rex said above, it would also cause massive bloat to
> update metadata, hurting even people who don't run KDE at all (at every
> single update push, even those which don't touch KDE packages, you still
> have to download all the metadata each time it changes), and possibly adding
> up to a lot more bandwidth than what you save by not downloading some apps.

Interesting thought, I wonder what the consequences would actually be.
Anyway, Rex said that we're moving towards a more modular KDE anyway,
because of the ability to run them on netbooks, etc. Will be
interesting to see if this becomes a problem.

>
> All this has been pointed out in previous threads. It would really help if
> users would read the f… uh… fine ;-) mailing list archives rather than
> asking the same questions again and again!
>

As mentioned, I did go through all threads for 2010..

-c
_______________________________________________
kde mailing list
kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org



[Index of Archives]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux