Re: virtuoso

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rex Dieter wrote:
> What I *do* know, if that they are not needed for the minimal virtuoso
> instance as required by nepomuk/soprano.  But, I didn't feel comfortable
> just deleting or omitting them completely from packaging, opting instead
> to provide them in an option subpackage, presumably for those folks who do
> know what they are and how to use them.  yes, lame on my part.

It's not lame. You did the right thing. People who want the utilities can 
install them. Most users don't need to know what they are for.

        Kevin Kofler

_______________________________________________
kde mailing list
kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org


[Index of Archives]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux