On Tuesday 04 May 2010 15:17:24 Anne Wilson wrote: > On Tuesday 04 May 2010 15:05:29 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 15:20 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > Michael J Gruber wrote: > > > > Gmane shows it both in kde and devel. So, if there's a mistake, it's > > > > not on Kevin's sending side. > > > > > > The people who only got the message once might be using duplicate > > > filtering. > > > > Hardly. I'm not even on the devel list, so that wouldn't explain it in > > my case. > > +1 I didn't receive the original message either. The thread on KDE list started with http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/2010-May/006937.html which is a reply to the Kevin's post that actually *didn't* arrive to the KDE list. Patrick was just the first one to say it. I don't remember seeing the original post, and cannot find it in the KDE list archives ( http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/2010-May/thread.html ). So the problem lies either with the mailing system of the KDE list, or it is someone's mistake. But not Patrick's, nor Anne's nor mine. I am not on the devel list, and was just about to complain about trimming the unseen original message in Guido's reply, but Patrick beat me to it. Then I thought that he will get it resolved and that someone will eventually produce a link to the original message, but instead he gets accused that it's his fault. It isn't, I am seeing the same issue, and you folks are beating him over a legitimate problem. The original Kevin's post just DID NOT ARRIVE TO KDE LIST !!! If you are sure it did, produce a link to it, please! And this has nothing to do with filtering, not in my case at least. I don't mind cross-posting, but if you are sending your reply to a list that didn't receive the original, I would appreciate to quote the original in full, or at least send a link to it, so that we can read it and understand the context of the reply. Now, Arthur eventually posted a link to the original message (from the *devel* list) in http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/2010-May/006949.html , but that is beside the point here. So please stop blaming Patrick for this, it is either the OP's fault or of the mailing system for the KDE list. HTH, :-) Marko
