On Wednesday 28 April 2010 08:40:47 Rainer Traut wrote: > Am 27.04.2010 20:13, schrieb Anne Wilson: > > That's worrying. I'm pretty sure CentOS doesn't support NFS4 - RHEL may > > do in the release that came out only a week or two ago, but didn't > > before that. I would think that the server will have to support the > > same protocol as the client is using, for it to work? > > Hi Anne, > > Centos5 (as well as RHEL5) do support NFSv4. > And I think C4 and RHEL4 do so too, invented in a later Update. > I've only been using nfs mounts for a year or so, so know very little about the subject. My first effort was to set up nfs4 and I was told that it wouldn't work, so I should use nfs3, which, AIUI, is what I currently have. Prior to that I used samba mounts, since the same mounts worked for both the Linux connections and the Windows ones. When I no longer needed the Windows connection I thought I should change. I guess samba will have moved on, too, in the interval :-( Anne -- KDE Community Working Group New to KDE Software? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20100428/f04cdf99/attachment.bin
