On 04/28/2010 02:13 AM, Anne Wilson wrote: > On Tuesday 27 April 2010 06:24:56 pm Martin Kho wrote: > >> On Tuesday 27 April 2010 19:14:15 Eli Wapniarski wrote: >> >>> On Tuesday 27 April 2010 15:45:36 Anne Wilson wrote: >>> >>>> On Tuesday 27 April 2010 11:38:17 am Ed Greshko wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 04/27/2010 05:22 PM, Anne Wilson wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Ed and Eli - sorry for the delay on this. I made a big bwa-hwa and >>>>>> destroyed my Win7 completely, to the point where I had to do a >>>>>> factory default install. That of course then needed >>>>>> re-partitioning, re-installing F13 and everything else. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm no nearer sorting this. I can edit the files on the F12 >>>>>> laptop, but not on the F13 one. You investigation raises >>>>>> questions, but frankly I think this is maybe beyond my expertise. >>>>>> I'll subscribe to the fedora-test list today. Have you raised the >>>>>> problem with them yet? >>>>>> >>>>> Yes... Didn't get too much in the way of responses.... And today, >>>>> less than 30 minutes ago, I wrote the list to inform them.... >>>>> >>>>> As Emily Litella would say...."Never mind". >>>>> >>>>> Someone had rolled back the rhelv4 server to a previous snapshot >>>>> where the idmapd.conf hadn't been modified correctly. I made the >>>>> common mistake of assuming.... >>>>> >>>> OK - so it solved it for you. It looks as though mine is a different >>>> issue, then. I can't see how it can be a server problem when the files >>>> are editable on the other laptop. It has to be something local, but >>>> I've no idea what. >>>> >>>> Anne >>>> >>> It could be a bug? >>> >>> Eli >>> >> Hi Anne, >> >> I'm not using nfs, but I say a Fedora wiki-page [1] telling that in F13 >> NFSv4 will be the default. May be this can give you a clue? >> >> Martin Kho >> >> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NFSv4Default >> > That's worrying. I'm pretty sure CentOS doesn't support NFS4 - RHEL may do in > the release that came out only a week or two ago, but didn't before that. I > would think that the server will have to support the same protocol as the > client is using, for it to work? > Centos supports NFS4. Just like RHEL does. > The wiki page says that the transition should be seamless, and the only > dependency is nfs-utils. I have nfs-utils installed. This is something of a > show-stopper for me. > Seamless is a matter of opinion. There are differences in how mount points work. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 260 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20100428/feb5abe1/attachment.bin
