On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> wrote: > On 01/25/2010 09:28 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> A number of people have been telling me for some time >> (months if not years) that my email is being defined as spam. >> [This is email that could not by any stretch of the imagination >> be considered as spam, even by the thought-police.] > > That's not a simple question to answer. ?The complex part is that each > ISP generally has it's own mechanisms and sets of rule on how/why to > label spam. > > But I can tell you what's contained in the header of this message you > just posted, > > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on > ? ? ? ?bastion2.fedora.phx.redhat.com > X-Spam-Level: IIIIIII (7%) > X-Spam-Status: No > > So, this one in particular, isn't bad. Gmail things all his emails are bad. This one had the warning: "Warning: This message may not be from whom it claims to be." -- Fedora 11 (www.pembo13.com)
