KMail is horrifically slow?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 06 January 2010 21:59:53 Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> Hello Anne,
> 
> On Tuesday 05 January 2010, 12:01, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > Since the 4.3.85 updates I've had lots of problems with kontact.  Some
> > are now sorted, but most obtrusive is the fact that every time I send a
> > message I get upwards of half a minute of 99% activity before it goes,
> > and during that time I can't read another message, change folder, or
> > anything.
> >
> > Is anyone else seeing this?  I'm turning off signing for this one, to see
> > whether that makes a difference.
> 
> I wouldn't say it's "horrifically slow", but it's slower than before.
> 
> With the System Activity viewer open, sorted by CPU usage, I created a new
> blank mail, and after pressing Send, I can see virtuoso_t climbing up the
>  list for a few seconds, consuming 23% of CPU.
> 
> In conclusion, I'd blame Nepomuk/Virtuoso.
> If you can test with the System Activity, share the results back.
> 
That seems to agree with my observations.  This morning, I even saw it using 
78% CPU, while the popup said that it was waiting for 'something' to happen.  
I didn't see any indication what that 'something' might be.

I tried the command recommended by techbase (with kontact closed, of course).

qdbus org.kde.NepomukServer /nepomukserver     org.kde.NepomukServer.quit

After which I saw several instances of:

Nepomuk Indexing Agents Have Been Disabled
The Nepomuk service is not available or fully operational and attempts to 
rectify this have failed.  Therefore indexing of all data stored in the 
Akonadi PIM service has been disabled, which will severely limit the 
capabilities of any application using this data.

The following problems were detected:
  * Nepomuk is not running.

Additional help can be found here:  userbase.kde.org/Akonadi

So then, to restart it:

nepomukserver
Nepomuk server already running.

All of which is confusing, to say the least.  By now, though, I'm totally 
convinced that this is where the problem lies.  Ksysguard shows Nepomuk CPU 
usage shooting up every time I have a KMail freeze.

Anne
-- 
KDE Community Working Group
New to KDE Software? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20100107/6e9dbc6f/attachment.bin 


[Index of Archives]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux