KMail is horrifically slow?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 05 January 2010 17:47:04 Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 January 2010 17:02:08 Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> > Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > Is anyone else seeing this?
> >
> > No, not at all. I didn't even toggle the akonadi Mail Dispatcher Agent
> >  offline.
> 
> I did - and it made no difference.
> 
> > I must clarify, however, that I am not signing emails with Kgpg keys at
> >  this time (that has historically been painfully slow and fraught with
> >  vicious circles of error and warning messages about the user requesting
> >  encryption or not requesting, etc., before anything ever worked).
> 
> Turning off the signing had no impact whatsoever, so it seems unlikely to
>  be that.
> 
Since then I have noticed that nepomuk is always active and consuming large 
amounts of resources during those apparently frozen states.  I have reported 
that to the developers.

Anne
-- 
KDE Community Working Group
New to KDE Software? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20100106/3a49f2ba/attachment.bin 


[Index of Archives]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux