Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > "...And then once you have updated your *kdebase* copy to the latest > *trunk* ... " > http://trueg.wordpress.com/2009/10/09/virtuoso-for-real/ Yet... http://trueg.wordpress.com/2009/10/09/virtuoso-for-real/#comment-623 | Alejandro Nova | The question that everyone is asking now: | May we use Soprano 2.3.63 with KDE 4.3? This is the solution for all | NEPOMUK headaches with Fedora. | | Sebastian Tr?g | Soprano 2.4 is fully backwards compatible, so yes. > in the last week there have been several changes in > kdebase/runtime/nepomuk ... and kdebase from trunk depends on kdelibs from > trunk, so you need kde trunk If any of the bugfixes from: http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/KDE/kdebase/runtime/nepomuk/?view=log are actually needed, we can just backport them. In fact I think building just kdebase/runtime/nepomuk from trunk should just work (but building parts of kdebase-runtime is of course a bit more work than cmake; make; make install; the simplest way is for us to simply patch our kdebase-runtime package). Kevin Kofler
