On Wednesday 16 September 2009 14:44:32 Rex Dieter wrote: > Anne Wilson wrote: > > On Tuesday 15 September 2009 09:42:01 Thomas Janssen wrote: > >> 2009/9/15 Anne Wilson <cannewilson at googlemail.com>: > >>> For several days now I've been seeing this - > >>> > >>> knetworkmanager-libs-0.8-0.21.20090815svn.fc11.i586 from installed has > >>> depsolving problems > >>> --> Missing Dependency: knetworkmanager = 0.8-0.21.20090815svn.fc11 is > >>> needed by package knetworkmanager-libs-0.8-0.21.20090815svn.fc11.i586 > >>> (installed) > >>> kde-plasma-networkmanagement-0.8-0.21.20090815svn.fc11.i586 from > >>> kde-unstable has depsolving problems > >>> --> Missing Dependency: knetworkmanager = 0.8-0.21.20090815svn.fc11 is > >>> needed by package > >>> kde-plasma-networkmanagement-0.8-0.21.20090815svn.fc11.i586 > >>> (kde-unstable) > >>> kde-plasma-networkmanagement-0.8-0.21.20090815svn.fc11.i586 from > >>> kde-unstable has depsolving problems > >>> --> Missing Dependency: knetworkmanager = 0.8-0.21.20090815svn.fc11 is > >>> needed by package > >>> kde-plasma-networkmanagement-0.8-0.21.20090815svn.fc11.i586 > >>> (kde-unstable) > >>> kde-plasma-networkmanagement-0.8-0.21.20090815svn.fc11.i586 from > >>> updates- testing has depsolving problems > >>> --> Missing Dependency: knetworkmanager = 0.8-0.21.20090815svn.fc11 is > >>> needed by package > >>> kde-plasma-networkmanagement-0.8-0.21.20090815svn.fc11.i586 > >>> (updates-testing) > >>> > >>> But - > >>> > >>> rpm -qa knetworkmanager > >>> knetworkmanager-0.8-0.21.20090815svn.fc11.i586 > >>> > >>> That looks like the correct version, to me. What's wrong? > >> > >> I had the same problem in rawhide a few weeks ago. To remove > >> k-p-nm-libs and k-p-nm was the only solution that time. You still have > >> knetworkmanager in F11. > >> > >> /me hugs his f10 with the plasmoid. > > > > Strange. I don't have either of them installed, yet every day I am told > > that there is a bugfix for k-p-nm that I should install. > > Should be fixed in 0.8-0.22.20090815svn.fc11 coming to updates-testing > asap. > > LONG VERSION; seems an early incarnation of this package included an > Obsoletes: knetworkmanager < 1:... (with epoch) > So, to workaround this, and Epoch: 1 was introduced > OK, thanks, Rex. Now I know it's coming I'll just stop worrying about it. Anne -- New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org Just found a cool new feature? Add it to UserBase -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20090916/f70f79ff/attachment.bin
