digikam confusion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: digikam confusion
From: rdieter at math.unl.edu (Rex Dieter)
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 19:30:59 -0500
In-reply-to: <h5d5c1$a40$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <h5d4q9$8kd$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A7A17C3.3070307@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <h5d5c1$a40$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
> 
>> kde-redhat/testing has digikam-0.10.0-2
>> kde-redhat/unstable has digikam-1.0.9-0.3.beta3
> 
> Ok. So testing is the newer.

Um... not exactly. :)

0.10.0-2 < 1.0.0-0.3.beta3

-- Rex

References:
- digikam confusion
  - From: Petrus de Calguarium
- digikam confusion
  - From: Rex Dieter
- digikam confusion
  - From: Petrus de Calguarium

Prev by Date: digikam confusion
Next by Date: KDE-SIG weekly report (32/2009)
Previous by thread: digikam confusion
Next by thread: Possible clue to NM+WPA problems
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KDE Users] [Fedora General Discussion] [Older Fedora Users Mail] [Fedora Advisory Board] [Fedora Security] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Mentors] [Fedora Package Announce] [Fedora Package Review] [Fedora Music] [Fedora Packaging] [Centos] [Fedora SELinux] [Fedora Triage] [Coolkey] [Yum Users] [Yosemite Forum] [Fedora Art] [Fedora Docs] [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux