-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 dexter wrote: > 2009/7/23 Rex Dieter <rdieter- RuT4X3KXNXH2fBVCVOL8/A at public.gmane.org>: >> Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >> >>> I am just curious and have couple questions. >>> -Why shall I want a gstreamer backend if I have a perfectly working >>> xine backend? >>> -Is this a solution in search of a problem? >>> -Is gstreamer going to be the default backend? If so, I hope this >>> doesn't turn to a disaster like pulseaudio. >> >> True, -gstreamer is under evaluation to become the default >> phonon-backend for F12, depending, of course, on the testing and >> feedback received. >> >> -- Rex > Feedback - This is crazy talk. Thank you for your constructive criticism. We'll add it to the list. Seriously though, Qt is developing the gstreamer backend as the main one. KDE however feels the xine one is the way to go (Amarok, Kaffeine). So, the worst that can happen (given that both work to become the default)...we have two working backends. Sounds good to me. Of course both backends have to stop sucking in their own ways, but that should come in time. This isn't the removal of xine (which is the one I've been using since whenever), it will still be there for you to use if you so choose. This is just which one is the default for new installations. - --Ben -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkpogQMACgkQiPi+MRHG3qT3LQCdFjERXCeFb9rU87LBvtqhN25p gYgAoIF8QcTpNVUlqf5Ll5lO1IYgR2Sv =OZ+M -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
