On Thursday 02 July 2009 19:00:01 Rex Dieter wrote: > Colin J Thomson - G6AVK wrote: > >> may need to add a dep to it somewhere (kdepim?) > > > > Sounds good to me as kdepim will use Akonadi more and more I guess. > > But... as-is, no does not. I'm guessing kdepim may have been the > only item on the kde spin needing akonadi, perhaps, we could get away > with having an akonadi-less spin now. Bare with me Rex (its been a long day :-) ) your saying kdepim can be built without Akonadi now?, are you suggesting builds without it. I would of thought it a good idea to keep it as it evolves (maybe PIM builds in unstable) Kmail will heavily depend on it, possibly KDE4.4/4.55 onwards, we all know about this problem which hopefully Akonadi will sort out: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41514 Colin -- Fedora (F11 Leonidas) Registered Linux user number #342953
